miércoles, 25 de febrero de 2015

Lab Sesion 3 - Boiling point elevations for solutions of benzoic acid in acetone

Objective – To investigate the relationship between the molality and the boiling point of a solution.


Hypothesis:
When more solute (benozoic acid) we add to the acetone, the vapor pressure of the solvent is less than the vapor pressure of the pure solvent. The boiling point of a solution will be higher than the boiling point of the pure solvent because the solution (which has a lower vapor pressure) will need to be heated to a higher temperature in order for the vapor pressure to become equal to the external pressure. In this case, when more benzoic acid we have in the solution, more it will take to boil.


Table:
Mass of benzoic acid in solution (g)
Molality
(mol/kg)
First run - Boiling point (oC)
Second run - Boiling point (oC)
Average boiling point
(oC)
Change in boiling point compared to pure acetone (oC)
0
0
56.0
56.4
56.2
0.2
0.5
0.82
58.8
58.0
58.4
2.4
1.0
1.64
60.7
60.5
60.6
4.6
1.5
2.46
51.5
51.3
51.4
5.4
2.0
3.28
65.3
64.7
65.0
9
2.5
4.0
67.1
67.1
67.1
11.1




Evaluation:
We think it was a complex experiment because we confused many times with the tested and this makes that we couldn´t finished correctly the experiment.
The first problem was to calculate the measurement because we calculated using the eye line and this is not very accurate. A good solution is to change the mL into grams so we can calculate it in the balance and we have the exact measure, but this will takes us lot of time and it would slow down our experiment and we don´t have so much time.
When we were going to make the graph using the table, we saw that there were two wrong results in the table, the one using 1.5 mass of benzoic acid in solution. To don´t put this mistake in the graph we remove it and we don´t use it in the graph.
Other big problem was when the liquid evaporate we lose solution and this affect directly to the project and when the acetone boils, and starts to grow bubbles, we also lose liquid and the concentration. We have to take care and being precise when we calculate the temperature because it could react and we can lose liquid because of the bubbles or if it boils, the acetone will evaporate and we also lose liquid, we will have other results.
Also a problem was when we poured acetone in the bunk and this affected in the temperature so we could have different results. To solve this problem, we have to be precise with the temperature because we know that the bunk is not going to be at the temperature we have, so a good idea would be, turn to the higher temperature and pay attention to the thermometer and the temperature it marks when it reacts. Finally we have to be precise with the temperature because when we get the test tube outside from the bunk the temperature will cool down, so we have to see when it reacts and see the correct temperature when the test tube is in the bunk.


Conclusion:
We said in the hypothesis that the more solute (benozoic acid) we add to the acetone, the vapor pressure of the solvent is less than the vapor pressure of the pure solvent, so the boiling point of a solution will be higher than the boiling point of the pure solvent.
In the graph we can see that with more concentration, the boiling point will increase, the line grows up. The function is directly proportional because when x grows also y grows.
When we finished the experiment and we get all the data we could prove that the hypothesis was correct because the boiling point of a solution will be higher than the boiling point of the pure solvent.


References:
Chemspider.com, (2015). Benzoic acid | C7H6O2 | ChemSpider. [online] Available at: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.238.html [Accessed 21 Feb. 2015].

Webbook.nist.gov, (2015). Acetone. [online] Available at: http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=67-64-1&Type=IR-SPEC&Index=QUANT-IR,0 [Accessed 21 Feb. 2015].

Lab Sesion 2

Objective: To relate a physical property to the intermolecular forces found in different chemicals.


Theoretical background: Many physical properties are related to the types and strength of intermolecular forces found in a chemical substance.
In this lab session we will look at the rate of evaporation, surface tension and viscosity.


Hypothesis: We are timing how much it takes to a little ball to go down through different chemicals. The chemicals have different intermolecular forces which can make them have different structures, which means different levels of viscosity.


Group 1 - similar molecular mass
Name
Molecular Mass
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3
Time average
Diethyl Ether
74,12
0,38
0,41
0,25
0,346666667
Pentane
72,12
0,41
0,32
0,34
0,356666667
Butanol
74,12
0,5
0,37
0,47
0,446666667
Propanoic acid
74,08
0,75
0,54
0,5
0,596666667








Group 2 - Acetates
Name
Molecular Mass
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3
Time Average
Methyl Acetate
74,08
0,69
0,69
0,55
0,643333333
Ethyl Acetate
88,11
0,59
0,75
0,59
0,643333333
Propyl Acetate
102,13
0,44
0,66
0,46
0,52
Butyl Acetate
116,16
0,37
0,5
0,41
0,426666667

Types of IMF´s and structure
Name
Structure
Type of IMF´s
Diethyl Ether
Van der Waal
Pentane
Van der Waal
Butanol
Van der Waal
Dipole
Propanoic acid
Van der Waal
Dipole


Name
Structure
Type of IMF´s
Methyl Acetate
Van der Waal
Ethyl Acetate
Van der Waal
Propyl Acetate
Van der Waal
Butyl Acetate
Van der Waal



Evaluation:
The first problem was that the balls of clay where very heavy to the viscosity of the components, this means that the ball goes down very quickly and we couldn´t see when it touch the bottom of the test tube, so we couldn´t measure the time. To solve this problem we made smaller balls of clay and we enveloped the balls in silver paper so the balls will occupies more space but the density is less so the ball will take more time to get down.        
Other problem is the time, we don´t know the exact moment when the ball touch the component and when it touch the bottom of the test tube so we cannot know when to start the stop watch and end it, in this way, the experiment is not completely correct because the results are approximated. The solution is to record when we drop the ball and we will know the exact moment when the ball reaches the end of the test tube, we get the time from the video.           
Finally, we would say that one important problem that slowed us in the procedure of the experiment was that there were many different components and we confused many times, we need more concentration on it and we have to be more organised to make a better experiment.


References:
Chemguide.co.uk, (2015). intermolecular bonding - van der Waals forces. [online] Available at: http://www.chemguide.co.uk/atoms/bonding/vdw.html [Accessed 25 Feb. 2015].

Science.uwaterloo.ca, (2015). Intermolecular Forces. [online] Available at: http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/intermol.html [Accessed 25 Feb. 2015].